RSA 91-A:4, VII frees every New Hampshire agency from ever assembling an index of what it holds. Granite State Report published one instead.
Every document Granite State Report holds, listed in one place, with the source and the rights holder named on each. The catalog opens with a free email subscription. Every record it lists is public and stays free.
In New Hampshire, revisions to the Right-to-Know Law include two bills signed in 2026, introducing a web address option for records requests and changing “teacher” to “educator” in exemption language. Seven acts have modified the law since 2024, impacting fee structures and transparency, amidst ongoing challenges in enforcing these changes.
The article critiques New Hampshire’s SNAP Work Notice, highlighting inaccuracies and omissions that mislead beneficiaries about work requirements. It outlines failures in communication regarding exemptions, deadlines, and penalties, ultimately urging the state to correct the misinformation to ensure transparency and compliance with federal regulations governing assistance programs.
New Hampshire’s RSA 106-F law creates ambiguity regarding what qualifies as press, exempting “accredited” outlets from licensing as private investigators. However, the term “accredited” lacks definition, putting independent journalists at risk of licensing issues. This situation underscores the need for clarity in press accreditation to protect journalism effectively.
The article critiques New Hampshire’s Right-to-Know Law memorandum, highlighting discrepancies between the guidance and statutory obligations. It identifies significant omissions that favor government agencies, such as a lack of clarity regarding public record access and recent legislative changes. The current memorandum lacks essential updates and guidance for citizens seeking transparency.
Gordon J. MacDonald resigned as Chief Justice of the New Hampshire Supreme Court on September 15, 2026, admitting to three ethics violations related to a $49,856 layoff payout for an aide. His resignation followed a Stipulation and Agreement with the Judicial Conduct Committee, which raised concerns over transparency in handling the situation.
The article discusses proposed new constitutions for New Hampshire and the U.S. to address issues arising from outdated governance. The author highlights the need for legal revisions to protect citizen rights, adapt to modern technology, and ensure equitable governance. Both drafts aim to empower citizens without compromising their foundational rights.
New Hampshire’s constitution mandates a vote every ten years on whether to convene a convention for amendments, emphasizing civic engagement. This contrasts with the U.S. Constitution, which lacks a regular revision mechanism. The author proposes a new national constitution to encourage generational consent, reflecting Jefferson’s vision, while addressing concerns about stability.
New Hampshire’s legislative process guarantees a public hearing for every bill, but accessibility issues arise due to scheduling during work hours and physical attendance requirements. Consequently, hearings are often dominated by paid lobbyists and professionals, limiting public participation. Recent changes to committee rules further complicate transparency and civic engagement.
New Hampshire’s legislative system features 424 lawmakers, paid only $100 annually, resulting in reliance on the Office of Legislative Services (OLS) for drafting bills. While this model enhances accessibility and efficiency, it obscures the true origin of bill ideas, as only sponsors are recorded. This creates a gap between sponsors and actual contributors.
The article critiques the slogan “Live Free or Die,” arguing that New Hampshire’s constitution emphasizes government serving the community, not private interests. It underscores systemic issues like low wages, high incarceration rates, and the burden of debt, demonstrating how these factors undermine true freedom and agency for citizens.
The Justice Department’s recent workshop intended to enhance negotiation techniques for Freedom of Information Act requests excluded public attendance, raising concerns about transparency. Historically, such sessions included requester input. The evolving focus on internal agency training without public engagement diminishes accountability, highlighting flaws within both federal and New Hampshire’s public records processes.
New Hampshire’s Department of Safety faced criticism for its handling of a Right-to-Know request related to firearms denial records. In a response, it denied five items in one sentence without explanation, while the sixth item is unaccounted for until December. This raises concerns about transparency and adherence to state law.
A New Hampshire registry documents police officer reputations, stemming from a 1989 murder case that highlighted concealed evidence. This led to the creation of the Exculpatory Evidence Schedule, publicly released in 2022, providing insight into officers with credibility issues. It reflects a broader battle for transparency in law enforcement.
New Hampshire government frequently uses the phrases “no comment,” “personnel matter,” and “pending litigation” to avoid disclosing information. However, legal precedents show that the first two phrases lost their legal validity in 2020. This article explores the implications of these phrases on transparency and public record requests under the Right-to-Know Law.
The article discusses New Hampshire’s RSA 91-A:3 law, which allows public bodies to meet privately while requiring disclosure within a strict timeframe. Despite procedural safeguards against secrecy, many boards fail to comply, and the state’s ombudsman position remains vacant, reducing accountability. Citizens must actively monitor these meetings to ensure transparency.
The article analyzes the dynamics of the New Hampshire Executive Council under Governor Kelly Ayotte, highlighting how her closest allies, rather than her opponents, caused significant political setbacks. It illustrates that betrayal stems from structural voting systems rather than personal envy, revealing the complexities of governance and political relationships in New Hampshire.
Independent New Hampshire Journalism · Northfield, NH The Power Playbook · Part One of Forty-Eight Never Outshine the Master Robert Greene’s first law of power says the servant who shines too brightly gets destroyed. New Hampshire has run that experiment three times in thirty-five years, and the results say the…
New Hampshire recently reformed its justice system by allowing convicted prisoners to present new evidence of innocence beyond the previous three-year limit. This contrasts starkly with leniency shown to a Supreme Court justice facing serious charges, highlighting a two-tiered justice system favoring those in power. Indigent defense remains critically underfunded, exacerbating inequalities.
This article outlines the annulment process for criminal records in New Hampshire, detailing costs, waiting periods, and implications. Annulment, costing around $350, allows individuals to legally deny previous convictions on applications, but arrest records remain permanently accessible. The piece critiques the misleading nature of the term “annulment” in this context.
New Hampshire’s Involuntary Emergency Admission (IEA) law allows the state to take custody of individuals in mental health crises but fails to ensure they receive care. The law lacks provisions for treatment without consent, leaving many with permanent records. Critics argue it functions more as a custody measure than genuine mental health support.
The ACLU of New Hampshire has filed a lawsuit against the State Police over extensive delays in responding to public records requests related to immigration enforcement. The lawsuit reveals issues with the state’s Right-to-Know Law, which allows indefinite extensions, effectively limiting accountability to only those who can afford legal representation.
New Hampshire judges can be removed through impeachment by the House and a trial in the Senate, but this process is rarely utilized, with only two judges impeached since 1784. The age limit of 70 effectively ends most judges’ service. Judicial discipline is managed separately by the Judicial Conduct Committee.
This guide provides essential information on suing police in New Hampshire under federal law, addressing Section 1983, qualified immunity, and procedural considerations. Key points include identifying constitutional rights violations, the importance of preserving evidence, and filing timely claims. It emphasizes the need for clear legal strategy and consultation with an attorney.
The New Hampshire Attorney General, as the state’s chief legal and law enforcement officer, oversees homicide prosecutions, police shooting investigations, consumer complaints, and the state’s transparency laws. Appointed rather than elected, the AG’s authority includes supervising criminal cases and advising state agencies, supported by a structured oversight system.
