U.S. forces have intensified lethal strikes against suspected drug boats, with at least 80 deaths reported since September. While legal opinions suggest these actions are lawful under a new “armed conflict” paradigm, critics argue they violate international law. This creates legal and moral dilemmas for operators carrying out these orders.
The U.S. has escalated its drug war tactics by conducting airstrikes on alleged drug-smuggling boats, resulting in over 80 deaths. Critics argue these strikes violate international law and amount to extrajudicial killings. While proponents claim deterrence, evidence suggests traditional interdiction methods are more effective and ethically sound.
The U.S. military operates under the guise of promoting democracy, yet often prioritizes capitalism and strategic interests. While officials assert the mission is to defend democratic values, historical actions reveal a tendency to support capitalist elites and intervene only when U.S. economic interests are at stake, compromising true democratic ideals.
The article argues that Facebook has transformed the public square into a private entity, monopolizing civic discourse. It proposes regulating Facebook as a public utility to ensure free speech, fairness, and transparency. Increasingly vital for grassroots campaigns and local politics, the platform’s algorithmic decisions and content policies hinder democratic engagement.